Kim Kardashian: The Truth About Whether She Actually Ripped Marilyn Monroe’s Iconic Dress

View gallery

Paul Simon’s Wife: All About His 30 Year Marriage, Relationship With Carrie Fisher & More

Kim Kardashian tearing Marilyn Monroe‘s costume? Consider it – or not! Truly, you shouldn’t consider the allegations that Kim, 41, broken the iconic outfit she wore on the 2022 Met Gala. Amid chatter that the Kardashians star left the garment broken, the homeowners of the costume – the Ripley’s Consider It Or Not Museum in Orlando, Florida – issued a press release the quell the chatter. “We hear you! Kim Kardashian’s stroll up the Metropolitan Museum’s stairs at this 12 months’s Met Gala has induced fairly the stir, however one factor it didn’t immediately trigger is the reported injury to Marilyn Monroe’s famed ‘Joyful Birthday’ costume from 1962.”

“Ripley’s resolution to let this garment have a Met Gala second has been hotly contested,” the group added, “so we’re right here to set the document straight. Within the spirit of transparency, drop your questions beneath, and we’ll goal to reply them.⁠”

Ripley’s issued the assertion on Instagram together with a slide present concerning the costume. “A report written on the costume’s situation in 2017 states ‘a lot of the seams are pulled and worn. This isn’t shocking, given how delicate the fabric is. There’s puckering on the again by the hooks and eyes,’ amongst different issues. Kim Kardashian sporting the costume has been hotly contested, however she didn’t personally injury the garment within the brief period of time it was worn at the Met Gala.”
⁠
The museum additionally answered the query of “what the heck have been you considering” in lending the costume to Kim. “There is no such thing as a disputing the fragility of the costume, and there was a calculated danger related to sporting it, however Ripley’s has been amassing notable pop-culture memorabilia, historic objects, and unbelievable artifacts for over 100 years. Our mission is to each entertain and educate and sparking conversations just like the discourse round this costume does simply that.” The group notes that the “historic significance of the costume” has been “heightened,” due to Kim’s sporting it to the Gala.

Kim additionally wore the costume for a couple of minutes, in response to Vogue’s in-depth piece concerning the journey to this Met Gala second. Kim left her lodge in NYC in a dressing robe, with barricades set as much as block the view from any onlookers or paparazzi. She arrived on the Met Gala in a small becoming room, the place a conservationist from Ripley’s, in white gloves, was readily available to assist her get into the costume. Kim wore it as she walked carefully up the steps alongside Pete Davidson, and as soon as she bought to the highest, she become a reproduction of the costume – additionally owned by Ripley’s — for the remainder of the night.

Ripley’s defended lending it to Kim by saying that the costume “has been launched to a brand new technology due to this Met Gala second.” It additionally mentioned Kim didn’t pay Ripley’s Consider It Or Not! to put on the costume. “Quite, Kardashian made a charitable donation to 2 charities within the larger Orlando space on behalf of the corporate.”