Greener oil or green industry? Gridlock puts Norway in a bind

Article content material

OSLO — Norway’s oil and gasoline trade is relying on renewable energy from hydro vegetation to chop emissions from its offshore platforms however rival demand from the inexperienced economic system is placing a spanner within the works.

The choice to maintain investing in new oil and gasoline tasks flies within the face of rising world stress to shift away from fossil fuels and Norway’s personal fame as a pro-green economic system with extra electrical vehicles per capita than another nation and a reliance on renewable hydropower for nearly all of its electrical energy.

However Oslo is loath to relinquish Norway’s profitable place as one of many world’s prime oil and gasoline producers, accounting for over 40% of its exports, and as a substitute needs to make the trade greener.

“The Norwegian parliament has set a goal of fifty% discount in emissions on the Norwegian continental shelf by 2030. Energy from shore is the one know-how that may ship cost-efficient cuts that may get the trade near this goal,” Deputy Oil and Power Minister Tony C. Tiller instructed Reuters.

There’s a sensible drawback with the plan. Norway’s electrical energy grid is constrained at some junctures and the wants of different industries, notably inexperienced economic system gamers comparable to battery factories and hydrogen vegetation, need to be factored in.

Article content material

Earlier this yr, the nationwide grid operator Statnett instructed Norway’s state-owned oil agency Equinor and companion Aker BP to look elsewhere for energy capability, one thing that might add “9 zeros” to a present 50 billion crown ($6 billion) challenge price estimate for electrifying a few of their platforms, in response to Aker BP CEO Karl Johnny Hersvik.

Statnett’s advice was a impolite awakening for the oil trade, which has made Norway one of many richest nations on the planet. With out entry to low-cost, renewable power a few of its oil fields might need to be shut prematurely attributable to rising emissions prices, analysts say.

Environmentalists say that’s what ought to occur, and that renewable power shouldn’t be used to increase the lifetime of the fossil gas trade.

“We name it greenwashing as a result of we consider that the oil and gasoline trade needs to be phased out, not expanded, and because it needs to be phased out, it doesn’t make sense to spend money on marginal enchancment,” Truls Gulowsen, the top of Buddies of the Earth Norway, instructed Reuters.

The measure would solely deal with a fraction of complete oil and gasoline emissions, whereas sucking energy from shore that’s important to develop new, inexperienced industries, he added.

Norway’s oil and power ministry instructed Reuters it “categorically” rejected accusations of “greenwashing,” as a result of electrification would deal with a big a part of the nation’s complete emissions.

The trade’s greenhouse gasoline emissions stood at 13.3 million tonnes of CO2 equal in 2020, or 27% of the nation’s complete, in response to the statistics workplace.

Article content material

Electrification might probably cut back the trade’s emissions to round 11.5 million tonnes in 2025, and slightly below 9 million tonnes by 2030, the federal government has stated.

Norway’s largest oilfield, Johan Sverdrup, produces oil with 0.45 kg of CO2 per barrel, 40 occasions lower than the worldwide common, because of electrification, Sweden’s Lundin Power , one of many companions, has stated.

GREENER OIL

Tapping renewable sources of power to make heavy-polluting industries greener is likely one of the extra controversial points of the transition to a lower-carbon world.

Norway, together with many different oil-producing nations, shrugged off an enchantment by the Worldwide Power Company this yr to cease investing in new fossil gas tasks.

Oslo has pledged to scale back its nationwide emissions by 50-55% by 2030, in keeping with European Union targets however not as formidable because the UK, which is second to Norway as the most important oil and gasoline producer in western Europe.

Like different oil-producing nations, Norway’s targets don’t take account of emissions from the oil and gasoline that it sells to different nations.

The federal government anticipates oil and gasoline extraction will naturally decline by 65% by 2050.

Within the meantime, producing petroleum with the bottom attainable carbon footprint might assist the nation market its merchandise as cleaner than rivals and minimize the trade’s publicity to anticipated sharp will increase in carbon taxes in coming years.

On Norway’s west coast, Equinor and its companion Aker BP are ready to listen to whether or not the ability regulator NVE will again their proposal to attach drilling platforms on the so-called NOAKA space, the most important oil and gasoline challenge within the North Sea after Sverdrup. A call is just not anticipated earlier than the tip of 2022.

Article content material

“We nonetheless consider that’s the greatest and most cost-efficient answer,” Aker BP’s Hersvik instructed Reuters.

If it doesn’t go their method, and the businesses want to decide on one other connection additional inland, they may nonetheless be capable to begin the manufacturing by 2026, however the prices will rise, he added.

NVE is a authorities company topic to the ministry of oil and power. Its licensing choices will be appealed with the ministry having the ultimate say.

Statnett says to attach NOAKA at the popular grid level would take 8-10 years as a result of a brand new transmission line must be constructed.

Renewable energy demand in Norway is about to extend from a mean 135 terrawatt-hours (TWh) over the last 5 years to between 170 and 190 TWh by 2030, a latest report by Norwegian trade foyer group NHO and the nation’s greatest labor union LO confirmed. The nation had a surplus of round 20.5 TWh in 2020.

The federal government is presently on the lookout for methods to hurry up much-needed grid fortifications, however in the interim, the conundrum of conflicting pursuits stays a headache.

“The electrification of the shelf supplies main cuts in greenhouse gasoline emissions, however it will be significant that it doesn’t come on the expense of restructuring and enterprise growth on land,” BKK, Statnett’s regional companion on the west coast, stated in an announcement. (Modifying by Carmel Crimmins)